The Casino of Health Care

The modern health insurance industry operates under a structure that mirrors the logic of a casino, creating profits by exploiting uncertainty and risk. At their core, both casinos and health insurance companies thrive on the principle that most participants—whether gamblers or policyholders—will lose more than they gain. While casinos provide entertainment, health insurance companies offer no such tangible benefit, acting instead as parasitic intermediaries that inflate costs, obstruct care, and undermine the overall efficiency of health care systems.

The Business Model: Betting Against the Consumer

Casinos and health insurance companies share a foundational similarity: they are built to profit by predicting and managing risk to their own advantage. In a casino, the "house edge" ensures that over time, the establishment will always win more than it pays out. Similarly, health insurance companies calculate premiums, co-pays, and deductibles to collect more money than they will ever spend on claims.

Policyholders are, in effect, placing a bet: they gamble that they will require enough medical care to justify the costs of their insurance premiums. The insurance company, conversely, bets that they will not. This creates an inherent conflict of interest: insurance companies maximize profits not by promoting health but by minimizing payouts, often at the expense of policyholders.

Inflating Costs: A Hidden Tax on Health Care

Health insurance companies, like casinos, do not generate wealth or create intrinsic value. Instead, they extract profits from the system, acting as a parasitic layer that drives up the overall cost of health care. Administrative overhead in the United States accounts for nearly 30% of health care expenditures, much of which can be attributed to the complexities and inefficiencies introduced by the insurance industry.

Every layer of administrative bureaucracy—claims processing, network negotiations, and utilization reviews—comes with a price tag. These costs are passed on to consumers, either in the form of higher premiums or inflated medical bills. The result is a system where patients pay not only for their care but also for the privilege of navigating an opaque and convoluted insurance structure.

Denial of Care: Rigging the Game

Casinos occasionally allow a gambler to win to maintain the illusion of fairness. Health insurance companies similarly approve certain claims to sustain public confidence in the system. However, their profitability depends on denying as much care as possible. Whether through technical loopholes, narrow networks, or pre-authorization requirements, insurance companies routinely deny or delay treatments, leaving patients to shoulder the burden of uncovered costs.

This behavior reveals the starkest contrast between health insurance and legitimate industries: whereas other businesses succeed by delivering goods or services, insurance companies profit most when they provide as little as possible.

The Moral and Economic Toll

Unlike casinos, which cater to voluntary participants, health insurance is a necessity for most people, often mandated by law or economic reality. This necessity gives insurance companies immense power, allowing them to dictate terms, set prices, and influence access to care. The result is a system where millions of people face financial ruin from medical expenses despite being insured, an outcome that is both morally indefensible and economically unsustainable.

Alternatives: Cutting Out the Middleman

The parasitic nature of health insurance companies is not an inevitable feature of health care. Many nations have demonstrated that single-payer systems or other public models can deliver high-quality care at lower costs by eliminating profit-driven intermediaries. These systems prioritize patient outcomes over corporate profits, proving that it is possible to provide universal coverage without the inefficiencies of a casino-like insurance model.

Conclusion

Health insurance companies operate as the casinos of health care, profiting from a rigged game that places policyholders at a perpetual disadvantage. They inflate costs, obstruct care, and contribute nothing of value to the health care system. To build a more equitable and efficient system, society must challenge the dominance of this parasitic industry and explore alternatives that prioritize health over profit.

---