A commenter on this blog lacks the courage to identify so Kadizzle will call him Unknown. Trump is a con man and a convicted felon. Even without the courts this is obvious. Matt Gaetz has shown us what he is. If Matt Gaetz is a saint, why not release the records? Was Al Capone a gangster? Everyone know what Al Capone was. However, he went to jail for tax evasion, not the rest of his criminality. As the old saying goes " You don't have to be a weatherman to know which way the wind blows". Most normal human beings can spot a liar, a con man, and a sexual abuser without the aid of a court. Being a rapist himself Trump is not one to rely on for appointing decent people. Decent people Unknown have the courage to put a name with their comments. Clues to the worth of a person are many. Trump is a worthless lying con man. You do not need a microscope to figure that out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
From ChatGPT:
1. Call Out the Exaggeration
"Calling Trump a rapist is an extreme accusation that isn’t supported by criminal convictions. Let’s stick to the facts."
2. Challenge the Evidence
"Are you aware that Trump has never been convicted of rape in any court? Making such a statement without evidence undermines serious discussions about justice."
3. Point Out the Distinction Between Allegations and Convictions
"There’s a big difference between allegations and proven crimes. Trump has faced accusations, but none have resulted in a criminal conviction for rape."
4. Address Specific Cases
"For example, in the E. Jean Carroll case, a civil jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, but they explicitly rejected the claim of rape. Civil cases don’t require the same level of proof as criminal cases, so it’s misleading to use that as proof of rape."
5. Assert the Need for Fairness
"Throwing around labels like 'rapist' without solid evidence is reckless and damages the integrity of real conversations about justice and accountability."
6. Redirect to Principle
"In this country, we base judgments on evidence and due process—not hearsay or personal dislike. If we want to hold anyone accountable, we need to stick to the facts, not make inflammatory claims."
---
This approach emphasizes accuracy and the principle of fairness, challenging their claim without leaving room for misinformation.
If someone claims that "Trump is a con man," and you want to challenge this assertively with facts, here’s how you can address it:
---
1. Define 'Con Man' and Challenge the Label
"A con man deceives people for personal gain, usually through fraud. Are you saying Trump has been convicted of such actions?"
This forces them to back up their claim with evidence, not just opinions.
2. Acknowledge Controversies, but Demand Proof
"Trump has been accused of controversial business practices, but accusations don’t automatically make someone a 'con man.' Where’s the proof of intentional fraud?"
3. Present Facts About His Business Record
Trump built a multi-billion-dollar brand through real estate, licensing deals, and media ventures. While not without criticism, many businesses succeeded, including:
Trump Tower and other real estate properties.
His branding empire and "The Apprentice" show.
His 2016 presidential campaign, where he defeated experienced politicians.
Yes, there were failures (e.g., Trump University, Atlantic City casinos), but no one becomes successful without risks or setbacks. Failures don’t make someone a "con man."
4. Address Specific Cases
If they bring up cases like Trump University, you could say:
"Trump University faced lawsuits and settled, but that doesn’t equate to criminal fraud. Many businesses settle lawsuits to avoid prolonged litigation, even when they deny wrongdoing."
If they mention taxes:
"The New York civil fraud case is still being litigated, and Trump denies the allegations. Until the courts decide, calling him a 'con man' is premature."
5. Emphasize the Need for Objectivity
"Throwing around terms like 'con man' based on dislike or unproven allegations isn’t constructive. If we want accountability, we need to rely on facts, not emotions."
---
This approach directly addresses their claim, highlights Trump’s accomplishments alongside controversies, and insists on evidence-based arguments.
If someone claims that "Trump is a convicted felon," you can challenge this statement factually and forcefully. Here’s how to respond:
1. State the Facts Clearly
"That’s factually incorrect. Trump has never been convicted of any felony in a criminal court."
---
2. Clarify the Difference Between Civil and Criminal Cases
"Trump has faced several legal challenges, but they’ve primarily been civil cases or ongoing investigations. A civil case, like the one brought by E. Jean Carroll, is not a criminal proceeding and does not result in a felony conviction."
Example: The Carroll case found Trump liable for sexual abuse in a civil trial, which does not require the same burden of proof as a criminal trial.
---
3. Address Pending Legal Cases
"Trump is facing criminal charges, such as the ones in New York, Georgia, and federally regarding classified documents. However, charges are not convictions, and the legal process is ongoing."
Until there’s a verdict in any of these cases, labeling him a "convicted felon" is premature and incorrect.
---
4. Challenge the Misinformation
"It’s important to stick to the facts. Calling Trump a 'convicted felon' without evidence damages the credibility of serious discussions about his legal issues."
If someone says, "Trump is a worthless lying con man," and you want to challenge this forcefully but factually, you can focus on dismantling each aspect of the claim:
---
1. Challenge "Worthless"
"Calling Trump 'worthless' dismisses decades of achievements. Whether you like him or not, he built a global brand, became a billionaire, and served as President of the United States. That’s far from 'worthless.' Many people admire his ability to connect with voters and disrupt traditional politics."
---
2. Address "Lying"
"Yes, Trump has been accused of exaggerations and falsehoods, like many politicians. However, labeling him a liar doesn’t erase the fact that he fulfilled several campaign promises, such as tax cuts, appointing conservative judges, and renegotiating trade deals. Actions matter more than rhetoric."
---
3. Debunk "Con Man"
"Being controversial doesn’t make someone a con man. Trump’s businesses, like his real estate ventures and 'The Apprentice,' created real value. While there have been lawsuits and failures, there’s no proof he systematically defrauded people as a criminal con man would."
If specific cases like Trump University come up:
"The Trump University settlement was a civil case, not criminal fraud. Settlements are common in business and don’t prove someone is a con man."
If you want to confront someone directly for spreading misinformation while maintaining credibility and confidence, you can respond with something like this:
---
"Kadizzle, this post, like many of your others, is full of inaccuracies. You consistently present false or misleading information as if it were factual, and it’s clear that your intent is to provoke outrage rather than contribute to a meaningful discussion. If you have evidence to back up your claims, share it, but inflammatory and unsubstantiated posts only undermine your credibility and spread unnecessary misinformation."
---
This response is firm, calls out the behavior, and challenges them to provide evidence for their claims, emphasizing accountability.
Thank you, ChatGPT
Interestingly, artificial intelligence is smarter than the Democrats.
I have now clue how I ended up reading all of this but it is apparent that this kadizzled has been drinking the kool-aid and is a victim of there own enlightened delusional self importance. The kadizzled is a prime example of the Dunning-Kruger effect and you will never get through to this person. They will never research they will never engage or answer real questions and follow there own agenda rooted in self importance. This person is dangerous as they are portraying signs of a very serious mental illness. I'm sure that this person is already wreaking havoc within there household and community.
Post a Comment